Black voters are challenging the at-large method of electing Georgia Public Service Commissioners in a historic federal lawsuit against the Georgia Secretary of State.
RICHARD ROSE, et al. Plaintiffs, v. BRAD RAFFENSPERGER
The Public Service Commission (PSC) is a body of five elected officials each of who allegedly represent a district. Commissioners must reside in one of the five commission districts to serve as that district’s commissioner. However, despite the presence of districts, commissioners are elected statewide.
Because statewide elections determine who becomes commissioner—and not voters who live in the district—this election method dilutes the voting power of black voters. The result is a chronic lack of representation on the commission, which has been nearly all-white and all-male since 1879. There have only ever been two black Public Service Commissioners. In 1999 Governor Roy Barnes appointed the first, David Burgess. In 2021, Governor Brian Kemp appointed Fitz Johnson to the PSC.
Without proper representation on the commission, black voters in Georgia find themselves at risk of higher rates that they cannot afford and have no voice to express their concerns.
The lawsuit alleges that due to this election structure, the Secretary of State has violated Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, which prohibits voting practices or procedures that discriminate based on race. The lawsuit demands the Secretary of State stop using the at-large method to elect commissioners and choose an election method that empowers voters to elect commissioners that will be responsive to their concerns.
Why representation on the PSC matters
- The PSC oversees and makes critical decisions about electricity, gas, broadband. Most importantly, they regulate Georgia Power. Their decisions impact the cost of utility bills, the sources of the energy that Georgian use, and how pollution from Georgia Power’s power plants is managed.
- Georgia Power has customers in nearly every county in Georgia. So the Public Service Commission makes decisions that impact Georgians all over the state.
- The PSC was established to protect consumers, not utility companies, but the PSC has voted repeatedly to raise rates, add fees, and add charges to the bills of Georgians.
- Georgians now pay the 8th highest electricity bill costs in the nation despite the company’s claim to have the lowest rates.
Did you know that the PSC regulates Plant Vogtle?
Plant Vogtle, the most expensive nuclear power plant ever built, is owned and operated by Georgia Power and Southern Company. Plant Vogtle’s units 3 and 4 are years behind schedule, and the costs have ballooned to $30 billion, more than twice the original estimate. At the same time, they’ve been enormously profitable for Georgia Power— because Georgia Power hasn’t been held responsible for mismanagement and delays. Instead, your Public Service Commissioners have allowed Georgia Power to pass the ever-growing costs of Vogtle onto residential customers, making the people of Georgia pay the bill for their mistakes.
- 2022 June 14 – Georgia Recorder – PSC challenger fights to stay on the ballot after being drawn out of the race – Georgia Recorder
- 2022 June 9 – AJC – Messages reveal alleged effort to draw Democrat out of Georgia PSC district
- 2022 February 16 – Associated Press – Service commission map would bar Democrats challenge
- 2021 July 28 – Georgia Recorder – Feds Side With Black Voters In Suit That Says Rights Violated By At-Large PSC Elections
- 2020 July 15 – Georgia Recorder – Lawsuit charges PSC at-large elections unfair to Black voters
- 2020 July 14 – AJC – Lawsuit: Georgia Public Service Commission elections harm Black voters
- 2022-02-03 Motion for Preliminary Injunction
- 2022-01-24 -097 – Order on motions for Summary Judgment
- 2021-08-30 – 090 – Order setting oral argument on the parties/motions for summary judgment
- 2021-07-28 – 086 – Statement of interest of the United States
- 2021-02-09 Scheduling Order Docket
- 2021-01-05 – 036 – Opinion and order denying the defendant’s otion to dismiss
- 2020-08-27 Response to Motion to Dismiss
- 2020-08-14 – Motion to Dismiss
- 2020-07-14 – Rose v Raffensperger complaint (temp case number)